|
Īsha's Resolution of the
Opposites and The Principle of
Īsha Upanishad
This excerpt is from ‘Īsha Upanishad’
by Sri Aurobindo
(courtesy of Sri
Aurobindo Ashram Trust)
The pairs of
OPPOSITES successively taken up by the Upanishad and resolved
are, in the order of their succession:
These discords
are successively resolved:
The principle it
follows throughout is the uncompromising reconciliation of
uncompromising extremes. Later thought took one series of terms,
the World, Enjoyment, Action, the Many, Birth, the Ignorance, and
gave them a more and more secondary position, exalting the
opposite series, God, Renunciation, Quietism, the One, Cessation
of Birth, the Knowledge until this trend of thought culminated in
Illusionism and the idea of existence in the world as a snare and
a meaningless burden imposed inexplicably on the soul by itself,
which must be cast aside as soon as possible. It ended in a
violent cutting of the knot of the great enigma. This Upanishad
tries instead to get hold of the extreme ends of the knots,
disengage and place them alongside of each other in a release that
will be at the same time a right placing and relation. It will not
qualify or subordinate unduly any of the extremes, although it
recognizes a dependence of one on the other. Renunciation is to go
to the extreme, but also enjoyment is to be equally integral;
Action has to be complete and ungrudging, but also freedom of the
soul from its works must be absolute; Unity, utter and absolute,
is the goal, but this absoluteness has to be brought to its
highest term by including in it the whole infinite multiplicity of
things.
So great is this scruple in the Upanishad that having so expressed
itself in the formula "By the ignorance having crossed over death,
by the knowledge one enjoys Immortality" that life in the world
might be interpreted as only a preliminary to an existence beyond,
it at once rights the balance by reversing the order in the
parallel formula "By dissolution having crossed over death by
birth one enjoys immortality", and thus makes life itself the
field of the immortal existence which is the goal and aspiration
of all life. In this conclusion it agrees with the early
vedic
thought which believed all the worlds and existence and
non-existence and death and life and immortality to be here in the
embodied human being, there evolvement, there realizable and to be
possessed and enjoyed, not dependent either for acquisition or
enjoyment on the renunciation of life and bodily existence. This
thought has never entirely passed out of Indian philosophy, but
has become secondary and a side admission not strong enough to
qualify seriously the increasing assertion of the extinction of
mundane existence as the condition of our freedom and our sole
wise and worthy aim.
The Conscious Lord
and Phenomenal Nature
Phenomenal Nature
is a movement of the conscious Lord. The object of the movement is
to create forms of His consciousness in motion in which He as the
one soul in many bodies can take up his habitation and enjoy the
multiplicity and the movement with all their relations. [This is
also the view of the Gīta and
generally accepted.]
Renunciation and
Enjoyment
Real integral
enjoyment of all this movement and multiplicity in its truth and
in its infinity depends upon an absolute renunciation; but the
renunciation intended is an absolute renunciation of the principle
of desire founded on the principle of egoism and not a
renunciation of world-existence. [This, again, is the central
standpoint of the Gita, which,
however, admits also the renunciation of world-existence. The
general trend of Vedantic thought
would accept the renunciation of desire and egoism as the
essential but would hold that renunciation of egoism means the
renunciation of all world-existence, for it sees desire and not
Ananda as the cause of
world-existence.] This solution depends on the idea that desire is
only a egoistic and vital deformation
of the divine Ananda or delight of
being from which the world is born; by expiration of ego and
desire Ananda again becomes the
conscious principle of existence. This substitution is the essence
of the change from life in death to life in immortality. The
enjoyment of the infinite delight of existence free from ego,
founded on oneness of all in the Lord, is what is meant by the
enjoyment of immortality.
Action in Nature
and Freedom in the Soul
Actions are not
inconsistent with the soul's freedom. Man is not bound by works,
but only seems to be bound. He has to recover the consciousness of
his inalienable freedom by recovering the consciousness of unity
in the Lord, unity in himself, unity with all existence. [This
truth would, again, be generally admitted, but not the conclusion
that is drawn from it.] This done, life and works can and should
be accepted in their fullness; for the manifestation of the Lord
in life and works is the law of our being and the object of our
world-existence.
The One Stable Brahman and the
Multiple Movement
What then of the
Quiescence of the Supreme Being and how is persistence in the
movement compatible with that Quiescence which is generally
recognized as an essential condition of the supreme Bliss?
The Quiescence
and the Movement are equally one
Brahman and the distinction drawn between them is only a
phenomenon of our consciousness. So it is with the idea of space
and time, the far and the near, the subjective and the objective,
internal and external, myself and others, one and many. Brahman,
the real existence, is all these things to our consciousness, but
in it ineffably superior to all such practical distinctions. The
movement is a phenomenon of the Quiescence,
the Quiescence itself may be conceived as a Movement too rapid for
the Gods, that is to say, for our various functions of
consciousness to follow in its real nature. But it is no formal,
material, spatial, temporal movement, and only a movement in
consciousness. Knowledge sees it all as one,
ignorance divides and creates oppositions where there is no
opposition but simply relations of one consciousness in itself.
The ego in the body says, "I am within, all else is outside; and
in what is outside, this is near to me in Time and Space, that is
far." All this is true in present relation; but in essence it is
all one indivisible movement of Brahman which is not material
movement but a way of seeing things in the one consciousness.
Being and Becoming
Everything
depends on what we see, how we look at existence in our soul's
view of things. Being and Becoming, One and Many are both true and
are both the same thing: Being is one,
Becomings are many; but this simply means that all
Becomings are one Being who places
Himself variously in the phenomenal movement of His consciousness.
We have to see the One Being, but we have not to cease to see the
many Becomings, for they exist and are
included in Brahman's view of Himself. Only, we must see knowledge
and not with ignorance. We have to realize our true self as the
one unchangeable, indivisible Brahman. We have to see all
becomings as developments of the
movement in our true self and this self as one inhabiting all
bodies and not our body only. We have to be consciously, in our
relations with this world, what we really are, —this one self
becoming everything that we observe. All the movement, all
energies, all forms, all happenings we must see as those of our
one and real self in many existences, as the play of the Will and
Knowledge and Delight of the Lord in His world-existence.
We shall then be
delivered from egoism and desire and the sense of separate
existence and therefore from all grief and delusion and shrinking;
for all grief is born of the shrinking of the ego from the
contacts of existence, its sense of fear, weakness, want, dislike,
etc.; and this is born from the delusion of separate existence,
the sense of being my separate ego exposed to all these contacts
of so much that is not myself. Get rid of this, see oneness
everywhere, be the One manifesting Himself in all creatures; ego
will disappear; desire born of the sense of not being this, not
having that, will disappear; the free inalienable delight of the
One in His own existence will take the place of desire and its
satisfactions and dissatisfactions. [In the ordinary view all this
would be admitted, but the practical possibility of maintaining
this state of consciousness and birth in the together would be
doubted.] Immortality will be yours,
death born of division will be overcome.
The Active Lord and the indifferent
Akshara Brahman
The Inactive and
the Active Brahman are simply two aspects of the one Self, the one
Brahman, who is the Lord. It is He who has gone abroad in the
movement. He maintains Himself free from all modifications in His
inactive existence. The inaction is the basis of the action and
exists in the action; it is His freedom from all He does and
becomes and in all He does and becomes. These are the positive and
negative poles of one indivisible consciousness. We embrace both
in one quiescence and one movement,
inseparable from each other, dependent on each other. The
quiescence exists relatively to the movement, the movement to
quiescence. He is beyond both. This is a different point of view
from that of the identity of the Movement and Quiescence which are
one in reality; it expresses rather their relation in our
consciousness once they are admitted as a practical necessity of
that consciousness. It is obvious that we also by becoming one
with the Lord would share in this biune
conscious existence. [In the ordinary view the
jiva cannot exist in both at the same
time; his dissolution is into the Quiescence and not into unity
with the lord in the action and inaction.]
Vidya and Avidya
The knowledge of
the One and the knowledge of the Many are a result of the movement
of the one consciousness, which sees all things as one in their
truth-idea but differentiates them in their mentality and formal
becoming. If the mind (manīşhi)
absorbs itself in God as the formal becoming (paribhu)
and separates itself from God in the true Idea (kavi),
then it loses Vidya, the knowledge of
the One, and has only the knowledge of the
Many which becomes no longer knowledge at all but
ignorance, Avidya. This is the cause
of the separate ego-sense.
Avidya
is accepted by the Lord in the Mind (manīşhi)
in order to develop individual relations to their utmost in all
the possibilities of division and its consequences and then
through these individual relations to come back individually to
the knowledge of the One in all. That knowledge has remained all
along unabrogated in the consciousness
of the true seer or Kavi. This seer in
ourselves stands back from the mental thinker; the latter, thus
separated, has to conquer death and division by a developing
experiences as the individual Inhabitant and finally to recover by
the reunited knowledge of the One and the Many the state of
Immortality. This is our proper course and not either to devote
ourselves exclusively to the life of Avidya
or to reject it entirely for motionless absorption in the One.
Birth and Non-Birth
The reason for
this double movement of the Thinker is that we intended to realize
immortality in the Birth. The self is uniform and undying and in
itself always possesses immortality. It does not need to descend
into Avidya and Birth to get that
Immortality of Non-Birth; for it possesses it always. It descends
in order to realize and possess it as the individual Brahman in
the play of world-existence. It accepts Birth and Death, assumes
the ego and then dissolving the ego by the recovery of unity
realizes itself as the Lord, the One, and Birth as only a becoming
of the Lord in mental and formal being; this becoming is now
governed by the true sight of the Seer and, once this is done,
becoming is no longer inconsistent with Being, birth becomes a
means and not an obstacle to the enjoyment of immortality by the
lord of this formal habitation. [This is the stumbling-block to
the ordinary philosophies which are impregnated with the idea of
the illusoriness of the world, even when they do not go the whole
way with the Māyavāda; Birth, they
would say, is a play of ignorance, it cannot subsist along with
entire knowledge.]
This is our
proper course and not to remain for ever in the chain of birth and
death, nor to flee from birth into a pure non-becoming. The
bondage does not consist in the physical act of becoming, but in
the persistence of the ignorant sense of the separate ego. The
Mind creates the chain and not the body.
Works and Knowledge
The opposition
between works and knowledge exists as long as works and knowledge
are only of the egoistic mental character. Mental knowledge is not
true knowledge; True knowledge is that which is based on the true
sight, the sight of the Seer, of Sūrya,
of the Kavi. Mental thought is not
knowledge, it is a golden lid placed over the face of the Truth,
the Sight, the divine Ideation, the Truth-Consciousness. When that
is removed, sight replaces mental thought, the all-embracing
truth-ideation, mahas,
veda,
dŗşhti, replaces the
fragmentary mental activity. True Buddhi
(vijnāna) emerges from the
dissipated action of the Buddhi which
is all that is possible on the basis of the sense-mind, the
Manas. Vijnāna
leads us to pure knowledge (jnāna),
pure consciousness (chit). There we realize our entire
identity with the Lord in all at the very roots of our being.
But in
Chit, Will and Seeing are one.
Therefore in Vijnāna or truth-ideation
also which comes luminously out of Chit, Will and Sight are
combined and no longer as in the mind separated from each other.
Therefore when we have the sight and live in the
Truth-Consciousness, our will becomes the spontaneous law of the
truth in us and, knowing all its acts and their sense and
objective, leads straight to the human goal, which was always the
enjoyment of the Ananda, the Lord's
delight in self-being, the state of immortality. In our acts also
we become one with all beings and our life grows into a
representation of oneness, truth and divine joy and no longer
proceeds on the crooked path of egoism full of division, error and
stumbling. In a word, we attain to the object of our existence
which is to manifest in itself whether on earth in a terrestrial
body and against the resistance of Matter or in the worlds beyond
or enter beyond all world the glory of
the divine Life and the divine Being.
|